×

This is your last free article!

Register to get two more free articles plus an exclusive subscription discount, or click below to subscribe right away.

Register

Already a subscriber? Login in here.

ti icon

Features

The death of the hypercar?

2 years ago

Writer:

Andrew Frankel | Ti co-founder

Date:

23 October 2024

Twenty years ago, near as dammit, Bugatti launched the world’s first proper production car with an engine capable of producing 1000bhp. And yes, I know the Veyron was claimed only to have 1001 pferdestärke or ‘PS’ (a mere 987bhp) but when I drove it at its international press launch on Sicily, I was assured that, in reality, the car actually had ‘well over 1000 British horsepowers (sic)’.

So of course I could scarcely leave the island without finding out what that felt like, despite its topography being so singularly unsuited to such a vast, heavy and powerful machine, and when I finally glimpsed between sharp intakes of breath the power needle indicate four figures, I was aware I was ticking off another personal milestone. A thousand horsepower! Who’d have thought it? Certainly not little old me who’d entered the business 17 years earlier when there was not a production car on sale with close to half that amount. Only problem was that 1000bhp and the infrastructure required to harness it cost a million quid, around £1.7m in today’s terms.

How much, then, does that same thousand horsepower cost you right now? If you live in the US and order a Tesla Model S Plaid, it will set you back $83,490 or, put another way, £63,970, almost exactly the same as Audi will charge you for a mid-spec Q6 e-tron SUV.

These days, a Tesla Model S will out-muscle the Bugatti

Put a third way, the price of putting 1000bhp under your right foot today is just 3.7 per cent of what – inflation adjusted – you had to pay 20 years ago. And we’ll just forget for now the fact you have to live in the US to do it as the Model S is no longer sold here. That is some devaluation.

In the intervening years manufacturers that have launched cars with 1000bhp or more include Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, Lotus, Aston Martin, McLaren, Lamborghini, Koenigsegg, Dodge, Rimac, Pininfarina, Lucid, Czinger, NIO, Zenvo, Hennessey, SSC and goodness knows how many others I’ve forgotten. Others will surely follow.

So here’s the question. Who cares? I did 20 years ago because it was such a fantastical number, even to someone quite familiar with a 627bhp McLaren F1. Today? Not you lot so far as I can divine, and if there is a more discerning bunch of enthusiasts anywhere out there… well let’s be honest, there simply isn’t. Looking through what you wrote in response to our recent stories concerning the unveiling of both the McLaren W1 and Ferrari F80, the overwhelming majority of comments about both cars were negative. And you are the last constituency of fans who’d stick the boot in for the hell of it, as seems so popular on some other sites.

quotes icon

"For all their bamboozling outputs, they don’t appear to be expanding the envelope of road car ability in any direction, and that’s even before you’ve considered whether that is any more even a desirable outcome"

Modern hypercars not only outpace the F1, but period racecars too

Frankel had the unenviable task of taming the Veyron in Sicily

Now, it is true Ti didn’t exist just over a decade ago when these cars’ predecessors, the P1 and LaFerrari, made their way onto the world stage, so I can’t do a compare and contrast, but nor do I really need to. Because I remember the shock and awe that went with them, the sound of jaws falling onto floors at the motor shows where they were first shown, the undignified scramble among my colleagues to be first to drive them and the admiration and green-eyed envy we felt for Chris Harris who was first to put ‘the holy trinity’ on a race track together (including the Porsche 918 Spyder). I even went out and bought an entire other Porsche just so I could drive the 918, but that’s another story.

Yet out there in the Ti community and in here in the car hack bubble, I just don’t get the same vibe with these cars. Nor anything close. And neither P1 nor LaFerrari had 1000bhp. But they did break new ground. Their successors do not. EV hypercars are far more powerful, and I’d be surprised if either could get around a track faster than the Aston Martin Valkyrie, a car announced seven years ago. For all their bamboozling outputs, they don’t appear to be expanding the envelope of road car ability in any direction, and that’s even before you’ve considered whether that is any more even a desirable outcome.

Today I see four-figure power outputs in almost entirely negative terms, largely because of the almost inevitable weight penalty that comes with them. You might be interested to know that the Veyron, for all its immense output, had an inferior power-to-weight ratio to the McLaren F1 with less than two thirds of its power. And while I admire those like McLaren which strain every sinew to minimise the acquisition of avoirdupois, big power requires a big powertrain, which then needs big brakes, heavy duty suspension and, increasingly, the addition of even more trick bits to help keep it under control.

“On the circuit, yes, if you are a gutsy, quick and experienced track driver you’ll be amazed by how quickly such a car can be hustled through a fast corner, but you’ll spend far more time in slow corners where the grip level on even the most serious of road-legal track day tyres will feel pathetic by comparison”

ti quotes

I refer here to the next inevitable stage of ‘hypercar’ development. If power is deemed – let it please the heavens – to have reached its practical peak then some new avenue of enquiry must replace it. And this is downforce. Both the Ferrari and McLaren come to market claiming to have a tonne of the stuff. Literally. And in a street car that is almost entirely pointless. On the road you won’t even feel it, other than perhaps through a seriously degraded ride quality because springs capable of supporting such enormous loads have had to be fitted, though there are clever ways of circumventing that.

On the circuit, yes, if you are a gutsy, quick and experienced track driver you’ll be amazed by how quickly such a car can be hustled through a fast corner, but you’ll spend far more time in slow corners where the grip level on even the most serious of road-legal track day tyres will feel pathetic by comparison. The car I recall that most clearly illustrated this point was the McLaren Senna which felt like a caged lion on Pirelli Trofeo R rubber. Only when I drove the track-only GTR on slicks did it fulfil its enormous but hitherto unrealised promise. It felt like a car released from its shackles, because that’s exactly what it was.

It never used to be like this. People will argue over the definition of ‘hypercar’ and which was the first in the same way they’ve argued for decades about the word ‘supercar’, but for me it’s actually quite easy. Forty years ago Ferrari produced a new GTO, latterly dubbed ‘288 GTO’, a limited edition car, unrelated to any other in the range despite appearances, with power and performance beyond that of any road car it had produced up until that time.

The Ferrri 288 GTO was the original hypercar

We didn’t call it a hypercar because that hateful term didn’t exist back then, but when you look at it today, that’s clearly what it was and, esoterica aside (remember Jerry Wiegert’s Vector?) it was the first and we won’t let the inconvenient truth that it wasn’t very good delay us here. Porsche replied with the 959, Ferrari with the F40, then came the others from Bugatti, Jaguar, McLaren and within a seven-year period an entire new category of car was up and running.

But back then these cars broke ground in a way they simply don’t any more. The F40 was the first road car that really would do 200mph, the Jaguar XJ220 had a higher top speed than anything that had been seen before and the McLaren F1? Well I’ve gone on record before to say nothing I have driven has ever broadened further the abilities of what a car entitled to wear a number plate could do.

But that was all 30 years ago and more. And the point then was that this was ground worth breaking because we were still – just – within the realm of what could actually be used by most drivers at least some of the time. And we had not yet progressed to a world where the most accessible and therefore most likely to be used aspect of a hypercar’s performance had become actively unpleasant to experience. Show me someone who says they actually enjoy accelerating from rest to 60mph in two and a bit seconds in a road car (which, as I’ve said before, places the same strain on your body as doing a full bore emergency stop, but in reverse) and I’ll show you someone either whose inner ear isn’t working properly or, more likely, someone talking out their hat.

The 959 was Porsche's explosive answer to the 288 GTO

The GMA T.50 is a modern-day McLaren F1...

...and Frankel thinks Gordon Murray has got it spot-on

McLaren says every one of its 399 W1s has already been allocated, sale agreed, and I understand Ferrari has already shifted all 799 F80s – a massive production run for this kind of car – despite a £3m price tag, but I still think the time has come to hit the reset button with these cars, because by the time the next cycle comes around in another 10 to a dozen years’ time, where are they to go? The Mercedes-AMG One has already lapped the Nürburgring in a time that would have qualified it in third place for the last 1000km race held on the Nordschleife in 1983, with just two works Rothmans Porsche 956s with full ground effect bodywork and massive slick tyres driven by Stefan Bellof and Jacky Ickx ahead of it.

It’s why I think Gordon Murray has got it right with the GMA T.50 and, indeed, got it right with McLaren F1 before that. Yes, the F1 did things no other car had done before, but that was merely a corollary of what it set out to do, namely to be the most enjoyable driver’s car ever created, because back then there was still useful progress to be made in areas such as acceleration and grip. But really its performance was a byproduct of his at times obsessive drive for lightness, not power. Remember the F1 engine only had 85bhp more than that of a Jaguar XJ220, but the car itself was probably 300kg lighter than a car which was itself far lighter than today’s Ferrari F80. The result was a level of deployable performance beyond the imaginings of the already blisteringly fast Jag.

And that is what I’d like the next Ferrari and McLaren hypercars to be: less powerful, smaller and far, far lighter with jewel-like naturally aspirated V12 engines, manual gearboxes, triple digit kerb weights and enough downforce to keep them stable, and not one kilo more. They’ll probably be slower than those of today, but they’ll come at a time by which everyone will have finally realised there is no commodity more overrated than performance that can’t be used most of the time and which is entirely hateful on those rare occasions it can.

The Lotus Theory 1 is Hethel's idea of a hypercar for the future

But for such cars to even be a possibility in that timeframe requires a change of heart and law in legislatures around the world and the rapid development of the sustainable fuels upon which they’ll have to run. Otherwise we’ll be looking at EV hypercars, a breed of machine which, if the rumours of sales of those that already exist are even close to being true, even the likes of Ferrari would likely find very hard to shift.

Does this foretell the death of the hypercar, half a century after its birth? I doubt it because I have limitless confidence in mankind’s ability to innovate its way out of undesirable situations, but something’s got to give. As Frank-Steffen Walliser, the man until recently in charge of all Porsche road car development and now occupying the top seat at Bentley said to me, ‘the goal is not EV, but zero emissions’. For those who want to see a new generation of superlight, ultra-involving hypercars – to my mind the only kind with a viable future – the campaign starts here. Let’s hope others see it the same way too.