×

You've read your three free articles!

Register to get two more free articles plus an exclusive subscription discount, or click below to subscribe right away.

Register

Already a subscriber? Login in here.

Features

Back to Library >
ti icon

Features

To share, or not to share? Part two

14 hours ago

Writer:

David Twohig | Engineer

Date:

18 June 2026

In part one, we picked on the latest generation of BMW’s M2 to point out some of the downsides – as well as the benefits – of platform sharing. The latter are so financially obvious that all car makers share platforms, to a greater or lesser extent. But this time around, let’s have a look at a very real platform sharing dilemma that most OEMs are facing right now – do they invest in a dedicated, optimised EV platform, or do they adopt a more ecumenical approach: all are welcome to our congregation, even ICE powertrains, thou sinners and givers-offeth of carbon emissions?

So let’s get stuck into a round of our old CEO-of-a-major-OEM role playing game.

Here you are, back in the boardroom, with the usual cast of C-suiters around the table. Your head is a bit muzzy with the lingering jet-lag/sleep-deprivation cocktail that you seem to be permanently nursing these days. The 6am investor Zoom call is already a hazily annoying memory, and you have that meeting with the second most obnoxious of the six union leaders later today. And now the CTO wants you to make a call about platform investment for the new mid- and large-sized vehicle line up for cars that will be around for the next two decades at least, or far longer than you will.

You've read your free articles!

Want more from The Intercooler? Subscribers get full access to our new daily articles plus our archive of 1500+ articles, as well as audio articles and exclusive podcasts, all ad-free. Click the link below to check out our monthly and annual subscriptions. Start your 30-day free trial and use coupon code 10SAVE for 10% off the first year.

Subscribe

Already subscribed? Click here to log in.